Zeeshan Mir Baz has collected the information from this website:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4431690/ in this article
Published in final edited form as:
said that:
Introduction
Using
health information technology (HIT) to improve care and outcomes for
older adults is a growing program of research propelled by recent
transformative policies such as the Health Information Technology for
Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act (
Blumenthal, 2010;
Institute of Medicine, 2011) and the Institute of Medicine report, "The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health." (
Institute of Medicine, 2010).
Both documents call for the implementation of electronic health records
(EHR) and HIT solutions to improve the safety, quality and efficiency
of care. Several nurse scientists are at the forefront of advancing this
work, particularly using electronic health records, decision support
and telehealth. This commentary highlights examples of recent research
(2010–2014) led by nurse scientists using HIT to improve patient safety,
and the quality and efficiency of patient care. We also discuss future
opportunities for Gerontological nurse scientists interested in blending
the care of older adults and HIT and suggest strategies to increase our
capacity to engage in such innovative research.
Using the EHR to improve outcomes for older adults
Recent
incentives provided by the HITECH Act have resulted in rapid growth in
the development and implementation of the EHR. Nurse led studies are
beginning to demonstrate that effective use of the EHR can improve
outcomes of relevance to older adults such as pressure ulcers and falls.
Dowding and colleagues evaluated the impact of an integrated EHR in 29
Kaiser Permanente hospitals on process and outcome indicators for
patient falls and hospital acquired pressure ulcers (
Dowding, Turley, & Garrido, 2012).
They found that the EHR system was associated with improved
documentation of both fall and pressure ulcer risk assessments and
statistically significant improvements for pressure ulcer risk
assessment documentation. They demonstrated that improved documentation
using the EHR was associated with a 13% decrease in hospital acquired
pressure ulcer rates. The patient fall rates remained unchanged after
EHR implementation. The authors reported variation in these outcomes
across hospitals and care regions. They noted that in addition to EHR
implementation, organizational factors such as collaboration, teamwork,
and supportive leadership are needed to achieve sustained improvements
in quality and safety outcomes. This highlights a role for
Gerontological nurses as they can promote improvements in nursing
sensitive measures such as patient falls and hospital acquired pressure
ulcer rates by modeling adoption and use of the EHR and by leading
quality improvement efforts that engage both senior leadership and front
line nursing staff (
McFadden, Stock, & Gowen, 2014;
Rosen et al., 2010).
Leading geriatric care improvement programs within a healthcare
organization such as NICHE (Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem
Elders) is an example of how Gerontological nurses can partner with
nursing leadership and frontline staff to improve the care of older
adults. This type of program, coupled with an integrated EHR that
captures data in a structured, coded format and provides clinical
decision support can ensure that all older adults receive
evidence-based, personalized care and that nursing documentation is
reused to build evidence for future practice.
Gerontological
nurse experts can efficiently influence important outcomes and
standardize the way we assess and treat older adults by providing input
into which evidence-based assessment and decision support tools are
embedded into the EHR. For example, in a study in long-term care, the
number of malnourished residents decreased significantly after embedding
evidence-based assessment tools into the EHR that prompted nutritional
and pressure ulcer risk assessments and documentation (
Fossum, Alexander, Ehnfors, & Ehrenberg, 2011).
Using such tools prompts the caregivers to assess these important
parameters, and, over time, the data generated during standardized
assessments and documentation will enable research and knowledge
generation using large datasets across settings and time. The IOM called
for a "learning health system" where we use EHR data to apply what is
known about a patient to generate or apply knowledge resulting in
evidence-based, personalized care in the form of decision support (
Friedman, Wong, & Blumenthal, 2010).
An integrated EHR with structured, coded data capture provides the data
infrastructure for the learning healthcare system that will transform
the way Gerontological nurses generate and apply knowledge. Data
recorded at the individual patient level during an encounter can be used
to personalize care for that patient and can be simultaneously applied
to spur discovery and innovation for future care delivery for older
adults (
Greene et al., 2009). Gerontological nurses play an important role in guiding the development of our "learning health system."
Providing decision support interventions
Using
the EHR as a tool to achieve a learning health system affords the
opportunity to build decision support within the workflow of nurses
caring for older adults. Decision support can take the form of alerts,
reminders, or algorithms that guide evidence-based care. Bowles and
colleagues implemented the expert discharge decision support system
(D2S2) within the hospital nursing admission assessment to identify
older adults in need of post-acute care such as skilled home care or
skilled nursing facility care. Based on how patients answer a series of
questions, an algorithm generates a daily report sent to discharge
planners alerting them of patients at risk for poor discharge outcomes
and therefore in need of a post-acute referral. Use of the decision
support achieved a 26% relative reduction in 30 and 60-day readmissions
in one study (
Bowles, Hanlon, Holland, Potashnik, & Topaz, 2014)
and 33%, 30-day and 37%, 60-day relative reductions in readmissions in a
subsequent study (under revised review at RINAH). Study findings
suggest that using decision support to early identify at risk patients
and arranging appropriate follow-up care is associated with improved
post-acute care outcomes.
Symptom management during cancer
treatment is another complex care challenge for many older adults and
their caregivers. A nurse led team created a computable algorithm that
adapts research evidence for use in a clinical decision support system
providing individualized symptom management recommendations to
clinicians at the point of care (
Cooley et al., 2013).
This complex challenge required mixed methods that involved two large
clinical sites, multiple panels of experts, a seven-step process, and
two years to complete. These rigorously developed algorithms are
available for testing.
HIT can also provide decision
support for sensitive topics like advanced care planning. Hickman and
colleagues created a multimedia decision support intervention that
delivers education about advanced directives to patients recovering from
critical illness (
Hickman, Lipson, Pinto, & Pignatiello, 2013).
Brought to the bedside via laptop computer, this intervention increased
the intent to sign an advanced directive by 25 times compared to the
commonly used advanced directive educational brochure, “Putting it in
writing”.
Clinical decision support in the EHR can also
facilitate guideline adherence. Beeckman and colleagues evaluated
whether a decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention improves
guideline adherence with pressure ulcer prevention recommendations in a
nursing home setting (
Beeckman et al., 2013).
They found that nurses who used the EHR system with the pressure ulcer
prevention decision support were more likely to provide guideline-based
pressure ulcer prevention interventions than nurses in the control group
who received a paper copy of the practice guidelines.
The
successful work of Dykes and colleagues clearly illustrates the value
of integrating fall risk assessment and clinical decision support into
the EHR (
Dykes et al., 2010). Based on qualitative research with professional and paraprofessional providers (
Dykes, Carroll, Hurley, Benoit, & Middleton, 2009), patients and family (
Carroll, Dykes, & Hurley, 2010),
Dykes and team learned that patient falls were a communication problem.
Nurses routinely conduct fall risk assessment on hospitalized patients
but the degree to which the results of that assessment and the
associated plan are communicated to other care team members, the patient
and family was variable. In a randomized control trial of over 10,000
patients, they found that by using HIT to integrate fall risk assessment
and clinical decision support for tailored fall prevention plans into
the workflow (
Carroll, Dykes, & Hurley, 2012),
older patients were more likely to have personalized fall prevention
plans and were less likely to fall during an acute hospitalization (
Dykes et al., 2010).
Remote monitoring of older adults
Telehealth,
defined as the use of video and biometric devices to monitor and
provide care at a distance is a rapidly growing intervention studied by
nurses. The body of literature in the domain of telehealth specifically
for older adults is growing in more recent years, and numerous studies
highlight the leading role of nursing in designing, implementing and
evaluating such systems. Published reports range from pilot feasibility
studies to large multi-site randomized clinical trials. One such recent
trial is by Takahashi et al examining telemonitoring in older adults
with multiple chronic conditions (Tele-ERA-Elder Risk Assessment) as a
tool to reduce hospitalizations and emergency department visits when
compared with usual care (
Takahashi et al., 2010).
The telehealth device used was a commercially available one that has
video monitoring allowing real-time, face-to-face interaction with the
provider team. Peripheral devices were attached to measure blood
pressure and pulse, oxygen saturation, glucose level, and weight. The
elderly study patients found home telemonitoring to be acceptable,
providing a sense of safety in their home (
Pecina et al., 2011).
However, home telemonitoring in older adults with multiple
comorbidities did not significantly improve self-perception of mental
well-being and may worsen self-perception of physical health. While a
report on the effectiveness for reducing hospitalizations has not been
published yet, findings from this trial have already highlighted the
role of a registered nurse as overseeing all processes and assessing any
changes in patient status as assessed by videoconferencing and
telemonitoring.
A nurse led study examining the
effectiveness of home based individual telehealth intervention for
stroke caregivers was conducted in South Korea (
Kim et al., 2012).
This study employed a quasi-experimental design with a
repeated-measures analysis to explore if caregiver burden will be lower
for families that receive a telecare intervention in addition to
standard care, when compared to the control group. Seventy-three
patients from five hospitals participate in the study. There was a
statistically significant decrease of family caregiver burden in the
experimental group and the intervention was found to be cost-effective.
Emme
and colleagues explored the role of home telehealth in facilitating
self-efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
She conducted this study within a larger initiative called the Virtual
Hospital (
Emme et al., 2014).
The Virtual Hospital included patients admitted to the emergency
department due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
exacerbation. Within 24 hours after admission, participants were
randomly assigned to receive standard treatment using telehealth
equipment with an integrated organizational support in their own home or
standard treatment in the hospital. The results of the study suggest
that there may be no difference between self-efficacy in COPD patients
undergoing virtual admission, compared with conventional hospital
admission.
Keeping-Burke et al conducted a randomized
clinical trial to determine whether coronary artery bypass graft surgery
patients and their caregivers who received telehealth follow-up had
greater improvements in anxiety levels from pre-surgery to three weeks
after discharge, than those who received standard care (
Keeping-Burke et al., 2013).
No group differences were noted in changes in patients' anxiety and
depressive symptoms, but patients in the telehealth group had fewer
physician contacts. Furthermore, caregivers in the telehealth group
experienced a greater decrease in depressive symptoms than those in the
standard care group and female caregivers in the telehealth group had
greater decreases in anxiety than those in standard care.
A
single-center randomized controlled clinical trial conducted by
Wakefield and colleagues compared two remote telehealth monitoring
intensity levels (low and high) and usual care in patients with type 2
diabetes and hypertension being treated in primary care (
Wakefield et al., 2012).
No significant differences were found across the groups in
self-efficacy, adherence, or patient perceptions of the intervention
mode. The study indicated that home telehealth can enhance detection of
key clinical symptoms that occur between regular physician visits but
called for further investigation of the mechanism of the effect of the
telehealth intervention.
In the studies
described above, patients and/or their family members have to operate
specific hardware and software applications as part of the telehealth
intervention. This often raises the question of feasibility for older
adults who may live alone and be very frail or inexperienced with
technology or are experiencing cognitive or functional limitations. As
technology advances, there are opportunities to utilize systems that do
not require a user to operate them but instead the systems enable
passive and ongoing monitoring of older adults’ well-being. An extensive
program of research led by Rantz and colleagues (
Rantz et al., 2012)
conducted in senior housing facilities demonstrates the power of
telehealth to predict adverse events and support seniors to age in
place. In these studies, sensor networks were deployed that included
stove temperature, bed, chair and motion sensors, and Microfost Kinect
sensors in order to assess behavioral and physiological patterns over
time and identify abnormalities or emergencies. Findings so far suggest
that the sensor data can serve as tools for early illness detection.
There are other initiatives underway exploring this concept of a “smart
home,” namely a residential setting with technology embedded in the
residential infrastructure to enable passive monitoring of residents
with the goal to assess overall patterns of activity, quality of life
and well-being. As part of the HEALTH-E (Home based Environmental and
Assisted Living Technologies for Healthy Elders) initiative in the
School of Nursing at the University of Washington, researchers have
installed various sensor technologies in apartments of older adults who
live in retirement communities in Seattle. The sensor technologies
include motion sensors to detect how one moves inside the home, as well
as infrastructure mediated sensing, namely an electricity sensor that
can detect electricity consumption by electricity source, and a water
sensor that detects water consumption by each water source. These
features allow the detection of activities such as meal preparation or
bathroom visit with a level of granularity that motion sensors alone
cannot provide. Advanced data analysis and pattern recognition
techniques allow not only the detection of activities but also potential
changes over time, for example, if data indicate a more sedentary
behavior over time, or an irregular pattern of activities calling for
timely interventions to prevent an adverse event (
Reeder, Chung et al., 2013).
Findings so far indicate that older adults accept these technologies if
they see a purpose and perceived usefulness does ameliorate privacy
concerns (
Chung et al., 2014)
Case studies showcase the potential of technology to identify health
related trends. However, the concept of smart homes is still an emerging
one and we are lacking large longitudinal studies and clinical trials
that will examine the effectiveness of such technologies and their
impact on clinical or other outcomes (
Reeder, Meyer et al., 2013)
What is in the nursing research pipeline?
A
search of the National Institute of Health REPORTER database informed
us about what nurse-led HIT studies, funded by the National Institute of
Nursing, are in the pipeline. We can look forward to hearing the
results of several innovative studies that address the needs of and
improve outcomes for Alzheimer’s patients and their caregivers. At least
four studies address dementia, two are RO1s, one R21 and one R15.
RO1NR014737 (Williams, Principal Investigator) will test the effects of
technology that connects dementia caregivers to experts for guidance in
managing disruptive behaviors and supporting care at home. Experts will
analyze video recordings of the triggers and precursors of the
disruptive behaviors along with its features and give prevention and
management advice to the caregivers. The second RO1NR011042 (Fick,
Principal Investigator) proposes the use of the EHR to deliver an Early
Nurse Detection of Delirium Superimposed on Dementia intervention. The
EHR will provide decision support through standardized delirium
assessment and management screens. The R21NR 013471 (Mahoney, Principal
Investigator) will develop an innovative bureau dresser retrofitted with
sensors and an IPAD that offers visual cues and verbal prompting to
help persons with dementia dress. The team hopes to advance the
technology from prototype proof of concept to ready it for large-scale
intervention trials. Finally, the R21NR013569 (Hickman, Principal
Investigator) uses gaming technology to create an interactive,
avatar-based tailored electronic program that will engage and prepare
family members for the role of surrogate decision maker when caring for
persons with impaired judgment.
Beyond the study of
dementia, the value of large dataset analysis is evident to meet the
aims of RO1NR010822 (Larson, Principal Investigator). In this study,
investigators are using data within a clinical data warehouse to conduct
three comparative effectiveness studies about hospital-acquired
infections and various contributing or preventive factors. The study
will also produce policies and procedures regarding future use of these
large datasets to make them more widely available for future research.
An RO3NR012802 (Kim, Principal Investigator) takes advantage of EHR data
documented during the longitudinal care of older adults as they
transitioned across multiple care settings including their homes. The
focus of the study is care coordination and the aims are to identify
interventions used in care coordination, identify relationships among
patients’ characteristics and care coordination interventions and
outcomes.
These exciting and innovative
examples give us a snapshot of what new knowledge we have to look
forward to and provide excellent examples of our learning health system
and the use of HIT to improve care for older adults.
How Gerontological Nurses Can Get Involved
The
HIT research completed to date provides a beginning foundation for
evidence-based nursing care of older adults and a learning health
system. Gerontological nurses can contribute to the learning health
system in several ways. First, nurses can adopt standardized,
evidence-based risk assessments in practice and work with their
information technology departments or vendors to make sure that these
assessments, corresponding interventions and patient outcomes are
represented in a structured coded fashion in the EHR. Linking
evidence-based interventions to assessment data in the EHR will ensure
that all patients receive evidence-based care during each encounter. In
addition, submission of risk assessment and outcome data to a national
nursing outcomes database such as the National Database for Nursing
Quality Indicators (NDNQI), the Collaborative Alliance for Nursing
Outcomes (CALNOC), the Veterans Administration Nursing Outcomes Database
(VANOD), or Military Nursing Outcomes Database (MilNOD) provides a
means to contribute the types of data needed for local quality
benchmarking while contributing to a learning health system that will
improve the care of older adults nationally.
Challenges and New Directions
As
noted throughout this commentary, nurses are leading research related
to the use of EHRs, clinical decision support, and telehealth. Many of
these efforts have resulted in improved care and interventions for older
adults. However, this work is not without challenges. One challenge of
EHR research is often the inability to conduct randomized clinical
trials. Most EHR studies are quasi-experimental because the EHR is
delivered to all patients therefore negating the ability to have a
simultaneous control group. When considering the quality of EHR research
we must take note whether confounding factors were considered and
adequate controls were instituted to compensate for the lack of
randomization. In addition, many of these studies have multiple
components. For example, in telehealth studies, the type of equipment
used, the number of times a patient uses the equipment, or the quality
of team communication could all affect the study outcomes making it
difficult to know which component is responsible for the impact. For
decision support, it is important to monitor the fidelity of the
intervention to understand the amount of exposure to the advice and to
monitor any other interventions occurring simultaneously that could
affect the outcomes. In addition, it is important to recognize that
these interventions are “decision support”. They are not one size fits
all and we must never lose sight of individual patient needs and
instances where the decision support is not applicable.
To advance the science of HIT research, we suggest more research to:
understand
how nurses use HIT systems in practice, the factors associated with
adoption, and the effect of EHR systems on nursing practice;
identify the organizational factors that lead to improved quality and safety outcomes after implementation of an EHR;
determine
how patient reported data can be captured and used to provide clinical
decision support that is aligned with patient preferences;
develop
HIT interventions that will facilitate the engagement of older adults
in their recovery plan within hospital, homecare, and long-term care
settings and in maximizing self-management, wellness, and independence
as they age at home
Finally,
we need to expand the settings in which HIT research occurs. A recent
systematic review of nursing informatics studies revealed 42.5% took
place in acute care, while only 3.75% occurred in homecare or long term
care respectively (
Carrington & Tiase, 2013).
Given the concentration of older adults served in homecare and long
term care, these areas of practice are prime sources for knowledge
generation through future studies.
Contributor Information
Kathryn H. Bowles,
van Ameringen Professor in Nursing Excellence, Director of the Center
for Integrative Science in Aging, University of Pennsylvania School of
Nursing, Philadelphia, PA.
Patricia Dykes,
Senior Nurse Scientist, Director of the Center for Patient Safety
Research and Practice; Director of the Center for Nursing Excellence,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA.
George Demiris,
Alumni Endowed Professor in Nursing; Professor in Biomedical and Health
Informatics, School of Medicine; Director, Clinical Informatics and
Patient Centered Technologies; Graduate Program Director, Biomedical and
Health Informatics University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
References
- Beeckman
D, Clays E, Van Hecke A, Vanderwee K, Schoonhoven L, Verhaeghe S. A
multi-faceted tailored strategy to implement an electronic clinical
decision support system for pressure ulcer prevention in nursing homes: A
two-armed randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2013;50(4):475–486. [PubMed]
- Blumenthal D. Launching HITECH. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;362(5):382–385. [PubMed]
- Bowles
K, Hanlon A, Holland D, Potashnik S, Topaz M. Impact of Discharge
planning decision support on time to readmission among older Adult
Medical patients. Professional Case Management. 2014;19(1):1–10. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Carrington JM, Tiase VL. Nursing informatics year in review. Nursing Administration Quarterly. 2013;37(2):136–143. [PubMed]
- Carroll
DL, Dykes PC, Hurley AC. Patients' perspectives of falling while in an
acute care hospital and suggestions for prevention. Applied Nursing Research. 2010;23(4):238–41. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Carroll DL, Dykes PC, Hurley AC. An electronic fall prevention toolkit: Effect on documentation quality. Nursing Research. 2012;61(4):309–313. [PubMed]
- Chung
J, Reeder B, Lazar A, Joe J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ. Exploring an
informed decision-making framework using in-home sensors: Older adults'
perceptions. Informatics in Primary Care. 2014;21(2):73–77. [PubMed]
- Cooley
ME, Lobach DF, Johns E, Halpenny B, Saunders T, Del Fiol G, Abrahm JL.
Creating computable algorithms for symptom management in an outpatient
thoracic oncology setting. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2013;46(6):911.e1–924.e1. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.016. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Dowding
DW, Turley M, Garrido T. The impact of an electronic health record on
nurse sensitive patient outcomes: An interrupted time series analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2012;19:615–620. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Dykes
PC, Carroll DL, Hurley A, Lipsitz S, Benoit A, Chang F, Middleton B.
Fall prevention in acute care hospitals: A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010;304(17):1912–1918. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Dykes PC, Carroll DL, Hurley AC, Benoit A, Middleton B. Why do patients in acute care hospitals fall? can falls be prevented? Journal of Nursing Adminstration. 2009;39(6):299–304. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Emme
C, Mortensen EL, Rydahl-Hansen S, Ostergaard B, Svarre Jakobsen A,
Schou L, Phanareth K. The impact of virtual admission on self-efficacy
in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a randomised
clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Nursing, January. 2014;30 [PubMed]
- Fossum
M, Alexander GL, Ehnfors M, Ehrenberg A. Effects of a computerized
decision support system on pressure ulcers and malnutrition in nursing
homes for the elderly. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2011;80(9):607–617. [PubMed]
- Friedman CP, Wong AK, Blumenthal D. Achieving a nationwide learning health system. Science Translational Medicine. 2010;2(57):1–3. [PubMed]
- Greene
SK, Shi P, Dutta-Linn MM, Shoup JA, Hinrichsen VL, Ray P, Yih WK.
Accuracy of data on influenza vaccination status at four vaccine safety
datalink sites. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2009;37(6):552–555. [PubMed]
- Hickman
RL, Jr, Lipson AR, Pinto MD, Pignatiello G. Multimedia decision support
intervention: A promising approach to enhance the intention to complete
an advance directive among hospitalized adults. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2013 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Institute of Medicine. The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. 2010 Retrieved: 2012, Retrieved from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12956&page=R1.
- Institute of Medicine. Digital
infrastructure for the learning health system: The foundation for
continuous improvement in health and health care: Workshop series
summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011. [PubMed]
- Keeping-Burke
L, Purden M, Frasure-Smith N, Cossette S, McCarthy F, Amsel R. Bridging
the transition from hospital to home: Effects of the VITAL telehealth
program on recovery for CABG surgery patients and their caregivers. Research in Nursing & Health. 2013;36(6):540–553. [PubMed]
- Kim
SS, Kim EJ, Cheon JY, Chung SK, Moon S, Moon KH. The effectiveness of
home-based individual tele-care intervention for stroke caregivers in
south korea. International Nursing Review. 2012;59(3):369–375. [PubMed]
- McFadden
KL, Stock GN, Gowen CR. Leadership, safety climate, and continuous
quality improvement: Impact on process quality and patient safety. Health Care Management Review, Feb. 2014;21 (E-pub ahead of print) [PubMed]
- Pecina
JL, Vickers KS, Finnie DM, Hathaway JC, Hanson GJ, Takahashi PY.
Telemonitoring increases patient awareness of health and prompts
health-related action: Initial evaluation of the TELE-ERA study. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health. 2011;17(6):461–466. [PubMed]
- Rantz
MJ, Skubic M, Koopman RJ, Alexander GL, Phillips L, Musterman K, Miller
SJ. Automated technology to speed recognition of signs of illness in
older adults. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2012;38(4):18–23. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Reeder
B, Chung J, Lazar A, Joe J, Demiris G, Thompson HJ. Testing a
theory-based mobility monitoring protocol using in-home sensors: A
feasibility study. Research in Gerontological Nursing. 2013;6(4):253–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Reeder
B, Meyer E, Lazar A, Chaudhuri S, Thompson HJ, Demiris G. Framing the
evidence for health smart homes and home-based consumer health
technologies as a public health intervention for independent aging: A
systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2013;82(7):565–579. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Rosen
AK, Singer S, Zhao S, Shokeen P, Meterko M, Gaba D. Hospital safety
climate and safety outcomes: Is there a relationship in the VA? Medical Care Research Review. 2010;67(5):590–608. [PubMed]
- Takahashi
PY, Hanson GJ, Pecina JL, Stroebel RJ, Chaudhry R, Shah ND, Naessens
JM. A randomized controlled trial of telemonitoring in older adults with
multiple chronic conditions: The tele-ERA study. BMC Health Services Research. 2010;10(255) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Wakefield
BJ, Holman JE, Ray A, Scherubel M, Adams MR, Hills SL, Rosenthal GE.
Outcomes of a home telehealth intervention for patients with diabetes
and hypertension. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health : The Official Journal of the American Telemedicine Association. 2012;18(8):575–579. [PubMed]
Comments
Post a Comment